Editor's Choice

Dr. Andrew Wakefield Speaks on Brian Deer, Autism, and Vaccines

10 Comments
Join the Conversation
Dr. Wakefield Speaks on Autism and MMR Vaccines - Photo by Julie Jordan Scott
Dr. Wakefield Speaks on Autism and MMR Vaccines - Photo by Julie Jordan Scott
Is Dr. Wakefield a fraud? Parents of autistic children don't think so. Watch videos of Lancet 12 parents sharing the truth about Brian Deer before deciding.

On January 13, 2011, Dr. Andrew Wakefield responded to the newest allegations brought against him by journalist, Brian Deer. Since the first of a series of articles Deer offered the Sunday Times in 2004, Deer has sought to destroy the credibility of Dr. Wakefield and his autism and vaccines theory. Wakefield is the main researcher of a paper published in the academic journal, Lancet, in 1998 (now retracted), and the first person to question a possible connection between environmental triggers and autism.

What Do Parents With Autistic Children Think of Dr. Andrew Wakefield?

Media reports side with Deer’s recent accusation that the 1998 paper was a hoax because Wakefield’s motivation was profit. However, these journalists haven’t read Dr. Wakefield’s original study or talked to the parents. Many parents of autistic children, including all of the parents of the 12 children involved in Wakesfield’s study, continue to support Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Not Brian Deer.

Dr. Wakefield’s View on MMR Vaccines and Autism

Dr. Wakefield denies Brian Deer’s allegations against him. The statement released January 13, 2011, “Breaking News: Statement From Dr. Andrew Wakefield: No Fraud. No Hoax. No Profit Motive.” can be read at the Age of Autism website. Dr. Wakefield states his work wasn’t fraudulent or a hoax, that profit wasn’t why he looked at MMR vaccines and autism.

“The MMR is only one vaccine of the 11 vaccinations on the pediatric schedule that has been studied for causing developmental problems such as autism. That is fact, not opinion,” Wakefield says. “I continue to fully support more independent research to determine if environmental triggers, including vaccines, are causing autism and other developmental problems.”

Brian Deer Personally Investigated by J. B. Handley

J. B. Handley is the parent of an autistic son, co-producer of the film Autism Yesterday, and co-founder of an international organization of scientists, physicians, and parents called Generation Rescue dedicated to researching not only the causes and treatments for autism, but also for ADHD and other chronic illnesses. He personally investigated Brian Deer and spoke to the parents of the autistic children involved.

What he discovered is not what is being reported. Handley’s findings, “Keeping Anderson Cooper Honest: Is Brian Deer the Fraud?” is a lengthy, detailed article well worth the time to read at the Age of Autism website as it exposes not only Deer’s mental state and possible financial motives behind his attack on Dr. Wakefield, but also some of his misleading statements.

Parents of Autistic Children Involved Still Blame MMR Vaccines

Despite Deer’s accusations, the parents of the autistic children who went into regression after MMR vaccines continue to support Dr. Wakefield and the others who treated their children at the World Free Hospital. They also continue to believe their children’s regression into autism came from those vaccines.

However, when the General Medical Council (GMC) didn’t allow them to testify at Wakefield’s hearing, they collectively wrote a letter to the GMC denouncing Deer’s filed documents and allegations. You can listen to that letter at the YouTube video, “ Lancet 12 Statement about Doctor Wakefield, Murch and Walker-Smith.”

The entire one-hour documentary, “Selective Hearing, Brian Deer, and the GMC, Dr. Andrew Wakefield Autism MMR,” can be viewed for free at the CryShameUK website. In the film, many of the parents share their feelings about autism and vaccines, how Deer was deceitful and insensitive, and correct many of Deer’s inaccuracies. It also shows how Deer’s communication with the parents was often confrontational, argumentative, and deceptive.

Autism and MMR Studies Support Parental Claims, Not Brian Deer

In the documentary, Brian Deer continuously states the children involved in Dr. Wakefield’s autism and MMR study did not have inflammatory bowel disease; that the study found no such thing. However, the point of Dr. Wakefield’s study, “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, Non-specific Colitis, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder in Children,” was to search for a connection between the childrens’ chronic enterocolitis and their autism.

In addition, other studies like “Autistic Enterocolitis: Fact or Fiction?” published by Polymnia Galiatsatos and colleagues in the Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology clearly talk about Dr. Wakefield’s autistic enterocolitis findings as fact, since it matched their own findings, including the parents’ stated statistics that 70% of those with regressive-type autism suffer gastrointestinal complaints.

Andrew Wakefield and Brian Deer Controversy

Despite Dr. Andrew Wakefield losing his job, career, and reputation, Brian Deer continues to fuel the controversy and fear over autism and MMR vaccines. With many journalists willing to regurgitate his allocations without investigating Deer or talking directly to the parents of the autistic children involved, the controversy isn’t likely to end any time soon.

For a more rounded knowledge of the controversy, read Handley’s investigation, watch the documentary, and listen to the parents. Wakefield’s study didn’t prove or disprove that vaccines cause autism. It wasn’t designed to. The study was simply the catalyst autistic parents needed to begin to unravel the puzzle known as autism.

Sources:

Age of Autism, “Breaking News: Statement From Dr. Andrew Wakefield: No Fraud. No Hoax. No Profit Motive.” January 13, 2011 (accessed January 15, 2011)

Guardian, Notes & Theories section, “The medical establishment shielded Andrew Wakefield from fraud claims,” by Brian Deer, January 12, 2011 (accessed January 14, 2011)

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, Galiatsatos, P., MD, FRCPC, Gologan, A., MD, Lamoureux, E., MD, FRCPC, Autistic Enterocolitis: Fact or Fiction? 23:2, 95-98, February 2009

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for educational purposes only and should not be used for diagnosis or to guide treatment without the opinion of a health professional. Any reader who is concerned about his or her health should contact a doctor for advice.

Vickie Ewell, Ray Ewell

Vickie Ewell - Vickie has worked with autistic individuals for 9 years. She has celiac disease and specializes in gfcf living.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 5+2?

Comments

Jan 21, 2011 2:50 AM
Guest :
Please do not presume to speak for many parents of autistic children. Many don't support Dr. Wakefield's 'findings'.
To discover what many parents and autistic individuals themselves think of Dr. Wakefield, please research the many websites, especially the ones operated by autistic persons.
Jan 21, 2011 6:54 AM
Vickie Ewell :
The article is not about the parents of "all" autistic children. It speaks to a side of the issue that media stories are not addressing. There are many parents of autistic children who do support Dr. Wakefield, and their voices are not being heard. The article is not about those who disagree.

Dr. Wakefield's original study clearly states that "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described. Virological studies are underway that may help to resolve this issue."

Dr. Wakefield's findings? "We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine."

No where in the entire study does it say that vaccines cause autism. The study was in regards to inflammatory bowel disease. The question of MMR vaccines being related to what the children began experiencing shortly after being vaccinated was raised by the parents themselves or their doctors. It was not raised by this study as Brian Deer and the media claim. The study was in regards to gastrointestinal issues, not autism. In fact, the study clearly states that not all of the Lancet 12 had autism. Brian Deer's arguments and accusations are both misleading and deceptive.

The point of the article was for readers to do exactly as you suggest: investigate both sides of the issue so their conclusions and decisions regarding vaccinating their children could be a well-informed decision not based on single-sided media bias, opinion, and fear.

The article does not address my own personal opinions on this issue. Nor do I speak for "all" parents of autistic children. As with any controversy the lines are clearly drawn by who's lives have been touched and affected by the findings, and who's have not. However, what the media and Brian Deer are saying, cannot be aligned with the study itself. Nor can it be aligned with what the parents of the children involved are saying.

Rather than accusing me of not reading websites run by autistic parents and thereby ignoring the point of the article, perhaps you might be willing to share why "you" disagree with Dr. Wakefield's findings of a new type of bowel disease, or his advice to stop giving combination vaccines and give single vaccines until further research can be done.

Jan 24, 2011 5:57 AM
Maryalene LaPonsie :
If Dr. Wakefield's study was on bowel disease, how did it end up associating autism with the MMR vaccine? I would be interested in reading more about that.

Maryalene
Jan 24, 2011 6:11 AM
Guest :
Wakefield is a fraud. He's been discredited numerous times. It is time to let go of this nonsense, go vaccinate children and stop fearmongering against public health measures. Just because you have a child does not make you an expert on anything.

Shame on the editors of Suite 101. This poorly written article spreads misinformation and should not be an Editor's Choice award winner.
Jan 24, 2011 6:23 AM
Stacy Herlihy :
Wakefield's "study" was nothing more than a big lie. He lied about the symptoms the kids experienced. He lied about the science. He submitted falsified data. He continues to advocate for bad treatments for autism that only harm children even further.

There is no other side. Parents should vaccinate their children. Autism is most likely caused by reclassification from other illnesses, better awareness and genetics. To claim that it is somehow caused by vaccination makes no sense at all. It is time for some parents of autistic children to let this one go and move on. Threatening public health by vaccine refusal does nothing but hurt children.
Jan 24, 2011 6:24 AM
Barry M. Grey :
This article isn't journalism. It's advocacy, disguised as a fair and even-handed look at Wakefield and his work. This isn't worthy of Suite 101.

And yes, I do know something about autism.
Jan 24, 2011 8:06 AM
Frances Spiegel :
Brilliant article - thanks
Jan 24, 2011 2:38 PM
Guest :
Just in regards to the 'Guest' - first commenter.
The head of this artice states - "Is Dr. Wakefield a fraud? Parents of autistic children don't think so." This is what you mean by "Please do not presume to speak for many parents of autistic children. Many don't support Dr. Wakefield..."
'Guest', I agree with you.
Maryalene, Barry and Stacy - I agree with you too.







Jan 25, 2011 1:23 PM
Vickie Ewell :
So "what" makes Wakefield a fraud?

In Britain, when your local doctor refers you to a major hospital (like the Lancet 12) your medical records don't travel with you like they do here in the U.S. Royal Free Hospital didn't have any of the kids' medical records to guide them in helping these children. A group of specialists (not including Wakefield, by the way) had to make a new diagnosis for each child.

Deer had "illegal" access to those local records and screamed "foul play" where they didn't agree with Royal Free Hospital's new diagnosis. There was no way Wakefield could have falsified data.

I agree that being a parent doesn't necessarily make you a good one. But neither does regurgitating the opinions and conclusions of others without first undertaking your own unbiased research. While personal experience always colors what we want to believe, the ability to separate truth from fiction isn't always easy due to personal agendas and undisclosed conflicts of interest on both sides of any argument.

In my own experience, the truth that lies at the heart of controversy tends to live somewhere in the middle of the two extremes of view. When people get caught doing something they shouldn't have done, the finger-pointing often brings out hidden facts from both sides. As long as people's lives continue to be affected for better or worse, the controversy over vaccines won't die.

Pretending the other side doesn't exist won't make it go away. Nor will insisting that our current beliefs and opinions are what everyone should think and do. While it's often hard to understand why something might be, those of us who have been negatively impacted by vaccines (even if we don't yet understand why), or have watched our children be negatively impacted by them, want answers.

The difficulty is that in a society such as ours, where everything is all about money, power, and protecting reputations, those answers might always be just out of reach. But that won't stop us from reaching for them.









Jan 26, 2011 9:27 AM
Maryalene LaPonsie :
Well, I really was interested in learning more about the study since I haven't ever read anything of substance about it so I did some digging online and found the Deer article from the British Medical Journal. Taken from http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5347.full:

"How the link was fixed
The Lancet paper was a case series of 12 child patients; it reported a proposed “new syndrome” of enterocolitis and regressive autism and associated this with MMR as an “apparent precipitating event.” But in fact:

Three of nine children reported with regressive autism did not have autism diagnosed at all. Only one child clearly had regressive autism

Despite the paper claiming that all 12 children were “previously normal,” five had documented pre-existing developmental concerns

Some children were reported to have experienced first behavioural symptoms within days of MMR, but the records documented these as starting some months after vaccination

In nine cases, unremarkable colonic histopathology results—noting no or minimal fluctuations in inflammatory cell populations—were changed after a medical school “research review” to “non-specific colitis”

The parents of eight children were reported as blaming MMR, but 11 families made this allegation at the hospital. The exclusion of three allegations—all giving times to onset of problems in months—helped to create the appearance of a 14 day temporal link

Patients were recruited through anti-MMR campaigners, and the study was commissioned and funded for planned litigation"


ML again: If that's all true - I am not sure how else we would describe Dr. Wakefield's report except to say that it is fraudulent. In the accompanying article, it include excepts from letters sent by pediatricians to Dr. Wakefield saying that there were developmental concerns for some of these children prior to the MMR vaccine, and he seemed to dismiss that information. That alone seems to indicate that he had an agenda in mind when evaluating these kids.

10 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement